![]() The infinite may be relative to only the infinite as this reality must exist to allow time to function in a persistent manner, past, present and future, even though time is a real Illusion. The finite may not contain the infinite because the finite is finite and must remain so and in order to exist an infinity must exist and be extant for the finite to have a place to exist, hence Relativity. ![]() It is pure ignorance to suggest we are unable to demonstrate or prove infinity is extant phenomenon due to causation. The finite by its very nature resides within the Infinite for by definition the infinite is not the finite, strictly due to the fact of persistent time which is finite relativity in at least three dimensions. Preface It is possible to understand and comprehend what time is from where time drives. ![]() It is not my endeavor to prove or disprove statistically accurate facts of science as this was the reason Sir Isaac Newton proposed a more rigorous method for discovering the Most importantly remains the ethical and moral code scientists ascribe too as the mind and intelligence of willful conscious empiricism which is validated each day by experimental and/or observational, mathematically demonstrable, precise measurements, correct in most regards. The Standard Model of physics at the CERN is as valid, consistently consistent and reliably reliable, as science is able to produce, based in the scientif ic method with equations including statistics of which I subscribe too. I think I have many of the answers which I have stated as: Everything is separate and/or opposite but the same ad infinitum squared where the Universe of universes is the geometric Triple Tetrahedral Triangle, Ellipsoidal Cubical Sphere, Double Spiral Void orbiting the Singularity (OBJECT) and/or OM point in seven planes, three World/Spheres and four dimensions in relativity as the Paramatma where the spiritual realm is contiguous and Gross reality is divided, all extant as big and small as the nature of nature by accident and automatically. W e require a way forward to answer the big questions which is who and what, when and where, we are, and why. I trust the cosmologists, astrophysicists and quantumists will bare with me and any perceived slights, I do not intend. Am I making certain conjectures is certain, but then this is the philosophy of cosmogony and quantum states of reality which I prefer to name as Relativity. This implies my paradigm, schema, codex and/or Weltanschauung based in scholarly research and deep cogitation. Preface I began to write a short paper to clarify some notions of others and my own around the time of the so called Big Bang events, realizing we must have a context for discussion. Enjoy the philosophy if you may for there is much to see within which most simply gloss over preferring the world of appearances over the Light. This information may cause the average ego mind to feel inadequate but there in is the trap of ego when in fact we are all infinite and Devine by our very nature. Human emotional maturity leaves a great deal to be desired and based on the knowledge we are in fact an intimate portion of the Devine Infinity would hopefully lead one to conduct themselves accordingly. We are all individually and together, quite literally God and it would be nice if we began to act and/or behave as if we were. ![]() I firmly believe that our existence as a race of fur bearing mammals would be so very much better if we simply were aware we are part and parcel of God, not in some abstract way but eventually in the relativity the gift to all human beings evolved, evolving and involved. The idea that science and spirituality are different forms of thought and have no bearing upon one another is a false premise. I continue to observe that the central premises and postulations, axioms and theorems of the original paper and others I have written dating back to 1991, remain intact in content and direction or vision, except for the process of always checking and refining our data sets and conceptualizations and visualizations. This paper is directly related to Unified Field Theory - Mathematical Proofs, A Paper by Jack Sanders, July 5, 2014.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |